Public decisions made by administrative bodies and the lower courts may be judicially reviewed by the High Court. In a judicial review the court is not concerned with the merits of the decision but rather with the lawfulness of the decision-making process, that is, how the decision was made and the fairness of it.
If the decision-maker does not have authority or does not give you fair procedure, you may bring judicial review proceedings in the High Court to challenge the decision. You must show that you have "sufficient interest" in the proceedings, that is, that you were affected in some way by the decision you are challenging. You must also show that you have an arguable case, that is, that your case has grounds.
The High Court will examine the decision and how it was reached. If the application for judicial review is successful, the High Court may then quash or cancel the decision.
Judicial Review is divided into two main categories:
Statutory judicial review schemes supplement Order 84 of the Rules of the Superior Courts with their own specific procedural rules. These statutory schemes narrow the availability of judicial review through such features as:
Decisions of the Environmental Protection Agency in relation to waste licensing under the Waste Management Act 1996 and the Waste Management (Licensing) Regulations 2004 (SI 395/2004) are subject to conventional judicial review in accordance with the provisions of Order 84 of the Rules of the Superior Courts.
A specific statutory procedure applies to application for judicial review of decisions made by the planning authorities. Sections 50 and 50A of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended by the Planning and Development (Strategic infrastructure) Act 2006) set out this procedure, which differs from that provided for in Order 84 of the Rules of the Superior Courts.
Applications for judicial review in respect of the Environmental Protection Agency in relation to Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) licence applications are regulated by statute. Section 87(10) of the Environmental Protection Act 1992 (as amended by the Protection of the Environment Act 2003 and Section 107(e) of the Water Services Act 2007), provides for judicial review or other legal proceedings to be initiated by any person, seeking to question the validity of a decision of the Agency to grant or refuse a licence or a revised licence, within a period of 8 weeks. This period may be extended, on application, by the High Court, where it considers that there is good and sufficient reason for doing so. There is no requirement on the person initiating these proceedings to demonstrate an interest or indicate a potential personal impact or having a sufficient interest.
If you wish to begin judicial review proceedings, you may want to contact a solicitor who will in turn brief a barrister to draft the papers for the case. It is also possible for you to represent yourself if you wish to keep your legal costs down.
There is no fixed rate of charges for legal fees in Ireland so you should obtain some quotes before deciding on legal representation. Your solicitor must advise you in writing of the fees you will be charged for his/her services. If it is not possible to give you a definite sum, he/she must estimate a sum or at the very least describe the basis upon which charges or fees will be calculated.
In judicial review cases on decisions subject to the provisions of:
each party to proceedings is only required to pay their own legal costs, except in certain circumstances. This is set out in Section 33 of the Planning and Development (Amendment) Act 2010 (pdf). However, the Court retains the discretion to award costs in cases concerning matters of exceptional public importance or where, in the opinion of the Court, it is appropriate to do so:
If you have a question relating to this topic you can contact the Citizens Information Phone Service on 0761 07 4000 (Monday to Friday, 9am to 9pm) or you can visit your local Citizens Information Centre.