The European Union (EU) has a limited role in family law matters. Each individual member state has its own rules about separation, divorce, maintenance of spouses and children, custody and guardianship and other family law matters. The role of the EU is mainly concerned with ensuring that decisions made in one country can be implemented in another. It also has a role in trying to establish which country has jurisdiction to hear a particular case. In effect, the EU does not have rules which govern, for example, who is entitled to have custody or access but it does have rules which try to ensure that custody and access orders made in one country can be put into effect in another.
EU rules in relation to enforcement of matrimonial orders (divorce, separation, annulment) and some parental responsibility orders (mainly custody and access) came into effect in March 2001. A new regulation on matrimonial matters and parental responsibility came into effect in March 2005. This did not involve any significant change in the rules on matrimonial matters but it did involve changes in the rules governing parental responsibility – see 'Parental responsibility' below. EU rules in relation to the enforcement of maintenance orders came into effect in March 2002. A new regulation on maintenance came into effect in June 2011 – see 'Maintenance' below.
If all the parties to a family law dispute are from one country and are living in that country then generally the dispute is heard by the courts of that country and a decision is made and implemented in accordance with the laws of that country. Problems arise when the parties are not living in the same country or are not nationals of the same country. It may not be clear which country’s courts should make the decisions, which country’s laws should be applied and how the decisions made in one country can be implemented in another.
Each country has its own rules about how this conflict of laws should be dealt with. It is possible that several countries would have jurisdiction to hear the dispute and that each would apply different laws. The procedures for having judgements recognised and enforced in another country can be difficult and sometimes impossible. Generally, if you have a judgement from a court in one country, you have to go through another judicial process in another country in order to have it implemented there (this process is known as exequatur).
These problems arise between all countries and not only between EU member states. A number of international conventions have been agreed dealing with such conflicts of laws. These international conventions continue to apply between EU member states and non-EU member states. The EU regulations in family law matters apply in all the EU member states except Denmark – this means that if there is a conflict of laws involving Denmark and another EU member state, the matter is governed by the international conventions if they are relevant.
The EU is only entitled to make laws in areas where the treaties give it the specific competence to do so. It has no specific competence to make laws in relation to divorce, maintenance or parental responsibility. This means it cannot make laws setting out the terms under which a divorce may be granted or the responsibility of spouses to pay maintenance or how decisions on custody to access to children are to be made.
However, the EU does have competence to promote judicial co-operation in civil matters which have cross border implications. It has made a number of regulations dealing with judicial co-operation in civil matters. In general, these regulations are based on the principle of mutual recognition – that is, that decisions lawfully made in one member state should be recognised and enforced in other member states and the procedures for doing so should be as simple as possible. The EU rules in the family law area generally build on the international conventions which already existed but which were not always implemented or did not have mechanisms to ensure implementation.
The recognition and enforcement of maintenance orders in EU member states was governed by Regulation 44/2001 of December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. This Regulation is known as "the Brussels I Regulation" and had been in effect in Ireland since March 2002. It replaced the 1968 Brussels Convention.
In June 2011, Regulation 4/2009 of 18 December 2008, on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, amended Regulation 44/2001 by replacing the provisions of that Regulation that apply to maintenance obligations. Regulation 4/2009, which is commonly referred to as "the Maintenance Regulation", aims to enable a maintenance creditor (you are owed money under a maintenance order) to obtain easily, quickly and generally free of charge, an order which can readily be enforced throughout the European Union. It does this by providing for common rules in relation to jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement, cooperation and standardised documents. It covers maintenance obligations which arise from:
Under the Regulation, each member state has a Central Authority. The Central Authority in Ireland is the Department of Justice and Equality. The Central Authorities co-operate with each other in facilitating the operation of the regulation. They also assist individuals in relation to applications available under the Regulation, particularly with regard to the transmission and receipt of applications, the initiation of related proceedings for the establishment or modification of maintenance, and for the enforcement of a maintenance decision.
Regulation 805/2004 of 21 April 2004 created a European Enforcement Order for uncontested orders – including maintenance orders – that came into effect in Ireland on 21 October 2005. Its provisions for maintenance orders were replaced by Regulation 4/2009, except for European enforcement orders concerning maintenance obligations issued by member states that are not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol on the law applicable to maintenance obligations. The vast majority of member states are bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol.
In 2007 the European Community signed a treaty on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters with Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. The treaty is known as the new Lugano Convention and came into force in January 2010. The Convention is substantially the same as Regulation 44/2001 and applies between an EU member state and one of the countries mentioned above.
The UN Convention on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance Payments (the New York Convention) was brought into effect for Ireland in November 1995 by the Maintenance Act 1994. This Convention is designed to facilitate the recovery of maintenance by a person living in one jurisdiction against a person living in another.
In 2007, the Hague Conference on Private International Law adopted the following two international instruments which are designed to facilitate the international recovery of maintenance:
If you want to enforce a maintenance order in a country not covered by EU Regulation 4/2009 or the Lugano Convention, you should contact the Central Authority for Maintenance Recovery in the Department of Justice and Equality for help – see 'Where to apply' below. The Department is responsible for transmitting and receiving maintenance.
There is more information about maintenance in our document on maintenance orders and agreements.
Regulation 1347/2000 of 29 May 2000 (called "the Brussels II Regulation”) came into effect in March 2001. It set out the rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility for children of both spouses. (Matrimonial matters includes divorce, annulment and legal separation but does not include, for example, the property consequences of marriage and the grounds for divorce.)
This regulation was replaced by Regulation 2201/2003 (“the new Brussels II Regulation” or "the Brussels II bis”) for cases arising on or after 1 March 2005 but its rules in relation to matrimonial matters are virtually unchanged. A Practice Guide for the application of the new Brussels II Regulation (pdf) is available.
The Regulation does not set out one general rule about jurisdiction in matrimonial matters. It provides that you may take a matrimonial action in the courts of the member state where one or both of you are or were habitually resident or the member state of your common nationality or your common domicile. This means, of course, that it may be possible to take the action in a number of states. The Regulation provides that once proceedings have started in a particular member state, other states must refuse jurisdiction. The Regulation does not deal with the question of which law applies. This is a matter for the member state that has jurisdiction. For example, most countries other than Ireland and the UK apply the law of the country of habitual residence of the parties while Ireland and the UK apply the law of the country of domicile.
The Regulation provides that a decision on a matrimonial matter made in one member state must be recognised and enforced in the other states without any special procedures. You do not have to go to court to have it recognised. However, any interested party may ask the court in the other member state not to recognise the decision. The court may refuse to recognise the decision:
The court is not entitled to hear an appeal against the decision.
As explained above, Regulation 2201/2003 does not determine what law applies when an application for divorce is being considered. For example, if an Irish person living in the UK wants to divorce a German spouse who is living in France, which national law applies?
Regulation 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 (known as "the Rome III Regulation") implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation was adopted by 14 EU member states. It came into effect in those member states on 21 June 2012. Ireland and the UK have not opted into this Regulation. The Regulation allows international couples in the member states where it applies to agree in advance which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation, as long as the agreed law is the law of the member state with which they have a closer connection. In case the couple cannot agree, the judge can use a common formula for deciding which country's law applies. This Regulation 1259/2010 does not affect the application of Regulation 2201/2003.
Regulation 2201/2003 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility came into effect in March 2005. This Regulation replaced Regulation 1347/2000 which applied from March 2001. The earlier Regulation only applied to judgments on parental responsibility that were issued in the course of matrimonial proceedings and it only applied to judgements in relation to the children of both spouses. The 2003 Regulation applies to all decisions made by the courts of member states in matters of parental responsibility.
The parents need not be married to each other. They need not be the biological parents of the child in question. It is not confined to court judgments. It also applies to agreements between parents if such agreements are enforceable in the country where they were made. In general, such agreements can be turned into court rulings and thereby made enforceable.
The Regulation covers the following aspects of parental responsibility:
Parental responsibility includes rights of custody and rights of access, guardianship, the placement of a child in a foster family or in institutional care. The Regulation does not apply to proceedings which involve:
The Regulation also applies to certain measures concerning the child’s property if they are related to the protection of the child. Measures that relate to the child’s property, but which do not concern the protection of the child, are covered by Regulation 1215/2012 known as Brussels I recast. It is for the judge to assess in the individual case whether a measure relating to the child’s property concerns the protection of the child or not.
The general rule is that the court which has jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility is the court of the country where the child is habitually resident. Again, in general, once the matter is before the courts in one country, that country continues to have jurisdiction even if the child has lawfully changed country of residence. It is possible to have the case transferred to the new country of residence if certain conditions are met and if it would be in the best interests of the child.
The parents may agree to have the question of parental responsibility decided in the court which has jurisdiction on the matrimonial matter or may agree to have the case heard by the court of a country with which the child has a close connection (for example, nationality).
If the child's habitual residence cannot be established, then the member state in which the child is present has jurisdiction.
In certain circumstances, the court which has jurisdiction may refer the case to another court if that other court is better placed to hear the case and this is in the best interests of the child. This could arise, for example, if the child’s habitual residence has changed. There are time limits on this procedure. If a child’s habitual residence changes as a result of a wrongful removal or retention, jurisdiction may shift only under very strict conditions.
The Regulation also includes rules on what is to happen if the proceedings are started in more than one member state.
In urgent cases, a court may take provisional protective measures even if another member state has jurisdiction on the substantive issue.
The Regulation creates a system of co-operation between central authorities of the member states. These authorities are obliged to facilitate communications between the courts of the relevant countries and must facilitate agreements between parents through mediation or other means.
Judgements given in one member state must be recognised and enforced in another member state. The court in the other member state may refuse to recognise the order only on the grounds that:
If you are applying to a court in another member state for recognition and enforcement, you are entitled to legal aid there if you were entitled in your own state. You may also get help from the central authority in the country where you are seeking recognition and enforcement.
In the cases of child abduction, it is not necessary to go through the court procedure for recognition.
Child abduction is the unlawful removal or retention of a child. If you have custody of a child and your child is abducted to another member state, you may apply to that state for the return of the child. The courts of the member state to which the child has been abducted can only refuse return of the child in limited circumstances – for example, if there are not adequate safeguards to ensure that there is no serious risk that return would expose the child to harm.
In general, the court must order the immediate return of the child. You can find out more in our document on international child abduction.
Access rights are directly enforceable in other member states. This means that it is not necessary to go to court to declare that they are enforceable if the court which issued the orders also issues the required certificate. (This certificate guarantees that procedural safeguards have been respected – for example, that all parties had an opportunity to be heard, the child had the opportunity to be heard if that was appropriate.) It does not matter who holds the access rights – it is usually a parent but can be a grandparent or other family member depending on the national rules involved.
The certificate means that the judgement is treated in the new member state as if it were a judgement of that state.
The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction (“the 1980 Hague Convention”) and the Hague Convention (1996) on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children continue to apply in cases where the 2003 Regulation does not.
The European Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children (the Luxembourg Convention) applies to a number of European countries. It is now of limited relevance because the EU Regulation or the Hague Convention covers the relevant countries.
Both Conventions were signed in 1980. They were brought into effect in Ireland in 1991 by the Child Abduction and Enforcement of Court Orders Act 1991.
Department of Justice and Equality
Tel:+353 (0)1 479 0200
Locall:1890 555 509
Fax:+353 (0)1 479 0201
Tel:+353 1 479 0200
Locall:1890 555 509
Fax:+353 1 479 0201
If you have a question relating to this topic you can contact the Citizens Information Phone Service on 0761 07 4000 (Monday to Friday, 9am to 8pm) or you can visit your local Citizens Information Centre.